Are there lawsuits against Boniva?
Here’s a switch. Last year in January (2011) Boniva received an untitled letter from the FDA saying the company who makes Boniva (Roche owned Genentech) used wording in their advertisements that didn’t match their scientific data.
The wording in question was: “After one year on Boniva, 9 out of 10 women stopped and reversed their bone loss.”
An untitled letter differs from a warning letter. With a warning letter, the entity must promptly correct the violation. An untitled letter is less punishing and broader in scope.
Eight months later in September 2011, Boniva changed its advertising campaign correcting the overstated claims.
- Why did they wait so long?
- How long was the overstated claim publicized to doctors, healthcare providers, and patients?
- How many prescriptions were written based on the pre untitled letter claims?
- Why misquote numbers when scientific data does not back it?
- Are there lawsuits against Boniva?
Apparently, there is back patting all around as Boniva reaches out to publicize the clarifications of the benefits and risks. However, if you’re one of the millions of women who are taking Boniva or have taken Boniva, you might be wondering about now what else they didn’t tell you.
And if you can’t trust Sally Fields, who can you trust?
About Anapol Schwartz
-
Anapol Schwartz is nationally known for the handling of unsafe drug cases. Many pharmaceutical related injuries occur because of failures to warn of side effects, such as the case with Topamax, where clinical trials are not large enough or are too short in duration to determine increased risks. Often, the unknown effects will surface when drugs are prescribed off-label or improperly.
-
If you or someone you know taken unsafe drugs and has been severely injured as a result, our unsafe drug lawyers can assist you in evaluating your case. Click here for a free case evaluation.

